April 2007

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for April 2007.

For those reading this blog, you get a preemptive look into one of the articles coming up in the next issue of Franciscan Angles, the newsletter of the Society of St Francis. I have been thinking a lot lately about the nature of prayer; what it is and is not. A lot of this interest has been sparked by a series of prayer schools I have been facilitating around the country of late. The key theme from these prayer schools has been exploring the concept of prayer incarnate or becoming prayer or more correctly, becoming that which you pray. This in part has also been sparked by my growing frustration with prayers I hear in church which are ‘form’ prayers (generic all purpose) or ‘magical incantation’ prayers (which ask God to meet our shopping list of wants and desires). Both of these which seem to leave us believing we have done our bit, and we are absolved of doing anything else.

As I thought more about this I began to see two aspects of prayer; contemplative and active, both of which are intrinsically related to one another, nourishing and nurturing the other. In contemplative prayer we seek to enter into communion with God, in active prayer we seek to enter into communion with one another, and all creation.

Contemplative prayer brings us into contact with the Divine Grace of God which is expressed as unconditional love for the created order; penultimately exemplified in the perfect expression of community in the relationship of the Trinity. Where each is equal with, and concerned for the other, each going out from the other, but for the other, and returning to the other. As we experience deep moments of contemplative prayer we literally sit in the presence of God and experience this Divine Grace. We are challenged to embody that Grace within ourselves. To become beings of unconditional love and perfect community. Methods of contemplative prayer then become the process which allows us to enter in this Divine space and challenge us to become instruments of God’s Grace on earth.

Active prayer then brings us into contact with the created order; humanity the flora and fauna. It is here that we are then challenged, having experienced being in the presence of the Divine, to become expressions of the Divine in our daily interactions with the created order. It is here that we must become that which we pray. In other words, if our prayer is fundamentally about becoming the embodied presence of Divine Grace, then becoming prayer means becoming the instruments of God’s Grace on earth. Thus we must become an expression of perfect community and unconditional love to all around us. This is an active practice of prayer which cannot simply be resolved by limiting our understanding and practice of prayer to ‘form’ and ‘incantation’ prayers. We must move beyond these infantile understandings of prayer and move toward a sense of prayer which brings us into direct communion with one another, and thereby into full communion with God.

Our prayer then is a journey from contemplative to active. But it is not linear, rather circular. That is, in the contemplative prayer space we experience some of what it means to be instruments of God’s Grace, we take this with us into the world; in the practice of active prayer. The experiences we have of becoming prayer then open our awareness and understanding of the Divine Grace further and we take that new awareness with us back into our time of contemplative prayer; and the cycle continues, with each circular motion giving us greater insight and ability to enter into communion with both the Divine and the created order. Ultimately the circle begins to lessen its arc until we find that there is no gap between contemplative and active prayer; and indeed we begin to pray without ceasing. Or as St Anthony the Great said where we are no longer aware that we are praying.

A part from why do you wear a brown dress and what do you wear underneath the commonest question I am often asked is why did you become a brother. This question came up in part in a conversation I had this afternoon, but more in relation to the context of my forthcoming attendance at a Diocesan discernment day (for those exploring ordained ministry in the Diocese of Brisbane).

It is usually at that point, but why…, that I have come to stop people and respond by saying I don’t want to… but…. I don’t think it is a case of want, that is, when people say why did (do) you want to… I want to stop them and explain that it is not like I want to be a brother or a priest. There are many things I want in life; travel, money, a great job with good benefits, a relationship, a home of my own, control over decisions about my life. There are some things I don’t want in my life; having to consider other people when it comes to making decisions (good or bad) about my life, yet more study, yet more ‘formation’.

However, there is a reality of which I must face. That is, the consistent and often persistent plague of thoughts that I am to live a different life than the one I want.

When I was a young lad my family lived below what people call the poverty line (which when defined or quantified is already far below the poverty line). It got even worse when my father passed away and my mother had to raise four kids on her own, with the grateful help of the department of social security. Going out was a big deal, even if that was to have lunch at the Woolworths’ cafeteria in Town Hall with my uncle during the Christmas school holidays. We (us kids) would be given a small amount of money to get lunch. One Christmas holidays we had our annual outing. Standing waiting for my uncle to arrive to meet us at Town Hall a lady, dirty, in ragged clothing, pushing a cart, passed us and proceeded to go through a garbage bin to find something to eat. I remember watching in horror that someone had to do this. I recall telling my uncle, who’d arrived, that she could have my lunch. I was fobbed off with some meaningless statement. But all I could think of was what if that was my mother, I’d want someone to help her and give her something better to eat and not have to be so degraded as to have to eat left overs out of a bin.

I also had a very itinerant childhood. I think I attended more schools than I’d had hot Sunday roasts in the same years. As often the ‘new boy’ I experienced all too often what it was like to feel left aside. On some occasions, I’d never worked out exactly why, sometimes being ‘on the outside’ meant being targeted for systematic terrorising by those ‘on the inside’. I was perplexed as to why people would exclude others and treat them in an appalling uncompassionate manner. I never understood the logic of that kind of treatment. Thankfully there were other moments when I found people who could rise above the apparent social ‘rules and customs’ and act in a fair, just and compassionate manner.

When I discovered church at the age of 11 I began learning about people who set aside their lives for the sake of others. They would forgo their lives, money, cars, houses, jobs, careers etc to enter the ‘missions’. They felt so strongly about the needs of others being greater than their needs that they were prepared to give up their lives for the sake of others. I was so inspired by the stories our ‘missionaries’ would tell, of how they had been in some developing country teaching, nursing, spreading the gospel that I wanted to be just like them. It made perfect sense. Surely being there for another in their time of need was exactly what I had learned from all those countless sermons and Sunday school lessons.

The feeling to be ‘just like them’ has been a constant dichotomy between the life I want to live and the life I feel called to live. As I got older there were times the voice was still and if I was lucky - silent. But then in the faces of the lonely, the hungry, the sick, the dispossed, the excluded it would raise its voice into a full symphony; using the lives of people like Damien of Molokai, Francis of Assisi, Theresa of Calcutta, to name a few, to be the instruments.

Out of curiosity, perhaps exhaustion, what ever it was I had to find an answer; to find if the symphony of voices could be silenced. So I decided I could do nothing else but to submit to the voices and see what happened. I gave up the life I had (I wanted) and entered into the life I felt the voices calling me into. I still don’t know if I belong in this world. I’m still not sure if I want to be in this world. I certainly battle to fend off temptation to go back to the life I want.

So when people ask me why did (do) you want to be… my first reply now is I don’t. But the Catch 22 is that the voices have not silenced, and while they continue their Opus in my heart and soul I cannot listen to the ones in my head which tell me I should return to my old life, the life I want.

 So when a student says to me why do you want to be a brother or the examining chaplain says why do you want to be a priest I simply now say  I don’t but I need to at least explore if I should.

Holding the Man - CoverHolding the Man, (1996) Tim Conigrave. Penguin Books. I read this book several years ago when it first came out and am now re-reading it. HTM is a powerful autobiography of friendship and love in the face of the reality of AIDS. This book won the 1995 Human Rights award for non-fiction. It chronicles the lives of Timothy Conigrave and his partner  John Caleo. Tim and John meet while attending a Catholic boy’s school in Melbourne. The two boys strike up a friendship and eventually become partners. The book, sometimes very confronting, often hilarious, and unfortunately equally sad, is a good but hard read. Sometimes I cannot put it down even though its 2 or 3 in the morning. Other times I force my self not to read it because it is such a good read I don’t want it to end, or in parts, don’t want to read what happens next. The book, from front to back cover, draws you into a world where you are challenged to face prejudice and emotions which lurk beneath even the toughest and cynical person. It brings humanity out of the depths of our soul and right into the core of our being; where we have no choice but to feel and to react. Anyone who has been alongside someone who has struggled to find acceptance in the heterosexual world or sit beside a friend or loved one who is dying will connect with this book in a profound way.

As I re-read this book I cannot help but think of the debates going on in the church at the moment over the level at which a homosexual person might be a part of the church. That is, are they simply welcome to be in the pew, or can they indeed hold a legitimate valid place in the ordained ministry of the church. I think that one thing that is sadly forgotten in most of the discussions surrounding sexuality and politics in the church, particularly in this respect, are the ‘innocent victims’. That is, those who sit back, hearing and reading these discussions and are made to feel not welcome.

Of course we are human. We try and live the life Christ calls us to live. But we seem sometimes not to be able to transcend our humanity to the point at which Jesus was able to do. Jesus was not one to sit back and see people set aside from receiving the Grace of God’s full embracing love. Jesus made a conscious effort to ensure that all were made to feel welcome in the sight of God. A mission which our Church might sometimes try and strive to do.

I don’t write this to provoke lengthy discussions on church politics and sexuality. Rather to ask ourselves in what ways do we place restrictions on others being able to feel included in God’s loving Grace.   

It is not random chance that the header picture of this blog is a lone railway track heading off into the distance. It is a symbol of journey, growth, challenges, change. One of my all time favourite movies is Stand by Me. The film version of Stephen King’s novel (The Body). After the death of his friend a writer recounts a boyhood journey with three of his friends as they go in search of a dead boy killed on the railway tracks. The boys set out to follow the path of the train tracks to find the dead boy. Along the way viewers learn of the various ghosts in the boys’ lives that journey along side them. The boys challenge, and are challenged by each other and themselves to face some of these ghosts. The movie is more than a simple boyhood adventure, it is a journey of transition from boyhood to adulthood, a coming of age story as each has to face the past in order to move on into the future. There is a compelling scene in which Gordie (Will Wheaton) and Chris (River Phoenix) are lagging behind the other two boys and have a profound moment of friendship and realisation which exemplifies this. After finding their objective the mood and motivation of the two boys change, leaving behind the body they return home deeply changed by the experience.

The essence of this drama is one that is hard to forget. In life we all have ghosts that travel with us. And like these four boys we all have to take on a journey to discover and confront them. But we must also come to the realisation that we can move on from them. Simple scenes such as this, a lone track heading into the distance can remind us of this. And of the need to continue to journey. However, we must also take time like Gordie and Chris to stop along side the track, pause, and allow ourselves time to acknowledge our ghosts and to move on from them.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v==VJ7Zi6jg8wM]

Stand by Me poster          The Body

If you have come over from Pilgrim on a Journey welcome, if you have arrived here for the first time, welcome. I have decided to move my blog here to wordpress because I find it a much more user friendly program than Blogger. I also wanted the change to reflect a more generic focus consistent also with my personality, hence the title The Mendicant Mind and Body: The Random acts of writing from an itinerant soul.

Newer entries »